Surviving Off-Off-Grid: Introduction
For over a century the Western Democracies have seen unprecedented growth and apparent success, and have been the envy of the whole world when it comes to standard of living. Now, if one looks closely, it appears that there is a change coming – and that change is making a lot of people really nervous.
But… have we been here before? Is there a time in history that we can look to in order to learn what is likely to befall Western society in the coming years?
Urbanism and Suburbanism, the Modern
Towards the end of the 4th century,
Do you think of
JIT – Just In Time
The city was provisioned in much the same way large cities are provisioned today. Away from the city there were clay and stone excavations, gold mines, tin and lead mines, metal forges and factories. Large granaries and warehouses in the harbor city of
Most of the citizens of
The Romans, after centuries of living the urban life, had little or no concept of how their food was grown or produced. If you asked a Roman how sustainable his existence was, he might reply “
But, at the turn of the 5th century, even though the Romans did not know it and could not have conceived of it, the end was very, very near. The thought of disaster would have been implausible to a Roman.
The Roman juggernaut was both hated and feared by friends and neighbors alike for hundreds of years and it could be said that, much like
During the sieges of
A hundred years after the sacking of
The “advancements” of
1. Agrarian life had become difficult due to the continuous hardships imposed by the constant warfare required for the maintenance of the big city-states. Oppressive taxes were bad enough, but the knowledge that your entire crop (along with your sons and sometimes your daughters) might be “requisitioned” by the next passing army was too much for many to bear. If everything was being stolen or destroyed in order to maintain
2.
3. Greed. It was said that
The city-dweller is almost never survival minded. Why should he be? His job is to perform his individual task and let others worry about the details of survival. The advent of specialization fractured the mind and caused man to focus on pieces of the puzzle instead of the whole picture. The urbanite doesn’t concern himself with whether or not the grocer has food or the peddler has supplies because during good times those things are not his concern. His mind is to be focused on his daily specialized tasks and the rest of the brain is allowed to atrophy. Governments and the prophets of urbanization provide entertainments to keep the mind numbed and fractured, and always new trinkets and wonderments to keep the soul anaesthetized. New products must always appear on the shelves in order to stave off boredom – and the manufacture of eternally useless baubles serves to maintain an ever increasing need for jobs, employment, and growth. Survival and preparedness, once an unconscious way of life and a God-given instinct for the continuance of the race and for motivation to productive work, became nothing more than a hobby for enthusiasts and a pacifier for worry-worts.
Modern Society and the Myth of Mitigation of Threats
Today, the idea of corporate mitigation of the threat of disaster or judgment is the foundational idea behind industrial and urban society. Our world now functions on the premise that if people become more specialized and come together to create a global corporate economy (a prosperity machine), that nothing bad can happen to the new global
It is an unhappy reality that it often takes massive and devastating economic interruptions in order to get people to think about doing things they ought to have been doing all along. It is a sad commentary on humanity that it often takes the fear of a second great depression to motivate people to learn the lessons of the first great depression. It is a sign of the human condition that most people, most of the time, will not do that which seems uncomfortable for them at the outset, even if it means that doing so will spare them the unbearable in the long run. This book is for the few who are willing to look at facts the way they are, and not just the way that people want them to be.
The 80/20 rule - and why I believe that it is overly optimistic
In every field of endeavor in which I have ever engaged, especially while I was back in the world, there existed what was called an 80/20 rule. Many of you may have heard of it. The 80/20 rule is flexible and it changes based on different situations or genres, but in general it goes like this...
20% of the people do 80% of the work, while 80% of the people do 20% of the work.
20% of the people are producers, while 80% of the people are consumers.
20% of the people provide 80% of the benefits that sustain society, while 80% of the people provide 20% of the benefits.
Many years ago I was in a survival related course, and the instructor said that 80% of the people are “victims, just waiting to happen”, while 20% of the people are rarely victims because they are intelligent, engaged, aware, and responsive. Well, I am going to go on the record as disagreeing with the 80/20 rule in this case. I do not believe that anywhere near 20% of the people are producers, workers, or survivors. I believe 20% is overly optimistic in virtually any situation, and it most certainly is overly optimistic when it comes to survival today. In reality, most of the people you know (likely including you), if examined in a historical context, are now not viable or sustainable, meaning that they would not survive even a short amount of time after a systemic failure of the JIT industrial/consumer life support grid that is our world today. I call this industrial-consumer life support system “the perpetual 72 degree consumer womb”. If a situation were to arise where people were forced, even for a very short amount of time (say weeks or months) to live exactly as their great-grandparents or ancestors lived, they would die off in massive numbers in very short order.
For example, when rural electrification was underway during the depression of the 1930’s, had a huge systemic disaster wiped out the entire electrical system in
Industrialism coupled with modern consumer capitalism has created generations of non-viable people, each generation more non-viable than the one before it, each peopled with individuals who cannot and would not survive even the mildest interruption in goods or services without massive government outlays and government rescue programs. We need look no further than Hurricane Katrina in
I am going to make a statement that might shock some people, and you would do well to ruminate on it for some time...
I believe that if tomorrow there were some sort of massive and comprehensive systemic disaster, resulting in a loss of JIT goods and services and a loss in available grid electrical power and water, and if that disaster (whether man-made or natural) caused a scenario where omnipresent paternal government could not or would not be able or willing to send any appreciable aid for a long period of time, that fully ½ or more of the population of the United States (or of just about any country for that matter) would die in less than a year. 150+ million deaths in less than a year, just in the
Think about that. Most people who read that might scoff or deny that such a thing could be possible. Like the Romans in 410 they cannot conceive of such a thing coming to pass, nor can they even begin to quantify the difficulties and realities of what will occur when such a thing comes to pass. If Americans today were forced, without warning, to live for just 1 year exactly like their ancestors lived 150 years ago, the greater part of them would die in a very short amount of time. This is exactly what I mean by “the perpetual 72-degree consumer womb”. This is the very definition of a system that is not-viable, that is unsustainable. Most fat, ignorant, and lazy modernists are likely to disagree with me, because most fat, ignorant, and lazy modernists do not have any idea what life would be like (even on a very short term level) without the government sponsored artificial womb that has been created for them and in which they now live. In every case, for the entire life span of virtually everyone who reads this, there has been a system in place to support and provide for all those who are unable or unwilling to take care of and provide for themselves and their families – and by that I do not mean to say that they are unwilling to “go to work”. I am saying that they are unable or unwilling to provide and support for their families OUTSIDE of the unsustainable JIT system that has put everyone within it at risk. We are several generations removed from the last generation that had to “make it” off the land without a safety net, or an artificial system which piped in food, water, electricity, and whatever else is necessary for “survival”. Even the term Survival, as it is most commonly used today, implies “lasting” or “making it through” to a time or place where the artificial womb of government or industry supplied material comfort and safety is in place. Most survivalist instruction and materials are predicated on the idea that survival means “to persevere until help comes or until ‘normalcy’ returns”, which means that this type of survivalism assumes a return to the crippling and atrophying way of life that put people at risk in the first place. Now, in and of itself and in the short run there is nothing wrong with this type of survival, if it is necessary and if it works. The problem is that so long as we deny that our current system of life and living is unsustainable, then we refuse to move towards a more realistic and honest system of life and living. In the current situation, every person is in daily peril of that very likely and impending reality where the system itself collapses and is either irreparable, or it cannot be restored to its former condition.
So Why This Book?
This book is not really a “how to” book. There will be some how to and plenty of “why to”, but this book was not designed to be a manual on Survival. This book is about decolonizing the corrupted and atrophied mind and teaching people another way to think.
What do we mean by “decolonize”? Well, every colonial power admits that there are certain things it must accomplish when it colonizes a formerly independent and free people. The colonial power must first convince its new subjects (by warfare or education or whatever means necessary) that they must change their former way of life and living. It is not enough that the people be forced to act differently, but, in the long term the newly colonized people must be taught to think differently. They must be reprogrammed. Their minds must be colonized. Colonialism, whether good or bad, is designed to make a people change the way they think and operate so that they can become valuable and beneficial to the colonial power. Well, in order to make a successful and thriving Agrarian people (the American colonies prior to the War Between The States) accept that industrialism would bring prosperity and unity, the minds of the people had to be subjugated and colonized. There is a long story of how this colonization of the mind came to be, and it is a subject that could fill a whole book in itself, but it is inarguable that this colonization of the Western mind took place. Thousands of years of history and successful living were thrown out, the baby with the bathwater. Over a period of 100 years, the Agrarian mind was overthrown and the Industrial and Urban mind was developed. Independency was replaced with dependency. Individuality was replaced with a horrible fake of the same name. The whole mind was fragmented and compartmentalized so that the man or woman can be forced into specialization – like an ant or a bee in a colony. People were robbed of their concept of “wholes” and instead were sold on the virtue of “parts”. Marketers and salesmen applied to the baser desires of greed and covetousness to convince people that their old lives were hard and unprofitable, but in the Brave New World they would have gadgets and fun and free-time, and leisure. The family was fractured, and each member became replaceable. Even the definition of “family” was altered.
Sin is Codified and Man attempts to Reign in God’s Stead
It is our opinion that urban-industrialism (and the inter-connected/inter-dependent world required to support it) is responsible for most of what is wrong with the world. Ok, sin is what is wrong with the world, but industrialism is the coalescence of all that sin does and can do in the world. It is distilled sin, in that it perpetuates and allows all that man imagines, and therefore, in industrialism nothing is restrained from man that he might imagine doing:
And the LORD said, Behold, the people is one, and they have all one language; and this they begin to do: and now nothing will be restrained from them, which they have imagined to do. (Gen 11:6)
Now this makes industrialism the modern
Ok, so if you disagree with that, then you have no reason to read further or to investigate the solutions provided for you in this book. Your system (urban industrialism) already reigns and is already out there on the plain of Shinar and you may go get your fill of it. If, however, you agree with what I have said, then Agrarianism is God's survival alternative. We believe that disconnecting from the current system is necessary for our spiritual safety, our physical well-being, and for our eternal good.
The Grid
The connection that ties people into this modern Babylonian system is the system we call "the grid". That grid consists of physical and spiritual connections and services that intertwine us with the world, and cause us to rely on the world system instead of on God. There is a huge difference between utilizing some aspect of the world system, as necessary, for the purpose of further separating from it (much as you would, if you were in a small boat, push off from a dock in order to gain speed to separate from it), and loving the world by being tied to it - so do not let naysayers and illogical barkers convince you that if you believe in separation, that this separation must be complete, total, and immediate - else you are a hypocrite. Let dogs bark. You just go on about the business of being obedient. Dogs defend what they love - never forget that. A barking dog is just defending his first love.
It is ridiculous and stupid for anyone to assert that because, at any particular time, we are still connected in one way or another to the grid, that we are hypocrites or that we are in the precise same position as someone who is completely and utterly dependent on the grid. It is such an illogical assertion that it barely merits a response. Unhappily though, it is the argument that world and grid lovers use the most when trying to defend worldliness. They will look at the Amish and they will say “Ha! Some of the Amish use cell phones or diesel generators! Ha! They are just as worldly as me, and they are hypocrites!” No. They are 99% less dependent on the system than you are. They are almost certainly not dependent on that cell phone or that diesel generator, and they almost certainly will not die if they have to go without it – since they have spent centuries learning how to live and survive off of the grid. So, like I said, the “hypocrisy” charge is as inevitable as it is stupid and illogical. Never mind barkers because they are just defending what they love.
Ok, as I was saying… this world "grid" system is most perfectly represented by the electrical grid. In the electrical grid, everyone is tied together and reliant on some mega-corporate (or fascist state/corporate conglomerate) system to provide them with power. (This is not the section where we discuss electrical power, we are just using electrical power as a parable) Now, the trick for the industrialist is to provide sooooo much power, and at such a seemingly low cost, that people will go out into the corporate industrial stores and buy tons of once needless stuff that can be plugged eternally into wall sockets. Each one of these things in and of itself uses only a nominal amount of power, but each is designed to accomplish several things:
1. To cumulatively provide huge amounts of money to the power company.
2. To make us daily MORE dependent on the power company for the maintenance of a certain "standard of living".
3. To make us daily LESS viable as creatures dependent on God alone for our provision, safety, happiness, and well-being. In other words, each generation is less and less able to survive without the comforts and conveniences provided by grid power.
4. To enslave us to our baser lusts. The system itself is designed to provide proxies for all that God would have for His children. The grid-system provides a perpetual 72 degree womb where every carnal need is met instantly by the world system.
So, after fallen man discovered the ability to create electrical power and to channel it down long power lines to each individual dwelling, the marketing arm of Satan clicked into business. Daily, more and more power gulping systems and gadgets are provided which take mankind farther and farther away from the way that God has ordained that His people live.
The Bible tells us what was the job of man before the fall:
And the LORD God took the man, and put him into the garden of Eden to dress it and to keep it. (Gen 2:15)
And this was the job of man after the fall:
Therefore the LORD God sent him forth from the garden of Eden, to till the ground from whence he was taken. (Gen 3:23)
We are to work with our hands (1 Thess.
So this grid system is a tool of the world for the enslavement of the minds and hearts of the people. Once again, if you do not agree, you may go your way... your system is out there and you may go have your fill of it. If, however, you still agree or you are considering what I am saying - we can move on to the next step.
GETTING OUT
Getting "off-grid" looks like a monstrous and overwhelming task. It is the giant in the land that keeps us from going in and taking the good land that God has promised us. The grid system is easy and relatively cheap (when you consider that you are already in it, and enslaved to it) in that it will cost you more to get out than to stay in. To be honest with you, our flesh loves air conditioning and microwaves and hair dryers and such things. All the junk we plug in to outlets is designed to please and anaesthetize our flesh. That is why they are so hard to get rid of. The first task in getting off-grid is to fall out of love with these things - to realize that they enslave us and they are poisonous to our souls and to our hope of eternal life. Not that going off-grid could ever save us - but be assured of this one thing, living for our flesh will certainly damn us. Think of going off-grid as going into a lifeboat from a sinking ship. You may not be saved if you go off the ship, but you will surely die if you don’t. Anyway, we have to fall out of love with these things that pamper and cater to the flesh. We have to look at them with a true and pure eye and we must evaluate the true purpose and need of things. We must convince ourselves that most of these things are poisonous to our well-being. Then we can more easily toss them. Those things that are conducive to off-grid living, or that can be used to our benefit, or that can be used to help us on our pilgrimage OUT of the system - we can retain for a time. The next step is to train ourselves to go without these things, and train ourselves on older and better ways of doing things:
Thus saith the LORD, Stand ye in the ways, and see, and ask for the old paths, where is the good way, and walk therein, and ye shall find rest for your souls. But they said, We will not walk therein (Jer.
Don't be one of those people who say "we will not walk therein. God has said that the old paths are better than the new ones. That is a fact declared from heaven. Learn it and love it.
The next step is to practice and begin to live the things we say we believe. This is the first real step on the Pilgrim's Progress. Step out and start to practice and live a different life. Sell all of the junk you don't need and begin to procure those things that will help you to live off-grid... which means you need to sell almost everything you own. Best to get used to it, since you won't take any of that stuff to wherever you go after you die anyway. Get rid of stuff and start to make do without.
This book is about a whole new way of thinking and a whole new philosophy of life (new for you, but old when examined historically). It is a paradigm changer, and it is also a spiritual road map to simpler and Godlier living. It is designed to challenge every thing you think about the world around you, and to offer alternatives to modern maxims and accepted shibboleths. In fact, there is nothing new here at all. This is, of all things, a history book – a time machine through which you may become acquainted with your own ancestors and their more successful and holy ways of life.
I pray it succeeds in whatever way the Lord would choose to use it.

23 Comments:
This is an excellent introduction. The historical context (Rome, etc) as a template for where we are today works really well. So far it seems like a good book to give to someone unaccustomed to the idea of living off-grid and apart from the world system. I think it will help open the eyes of some stuck in a system they've never really understood. My guess is that it will expose the average reader to many ideas/concepts they've never come across before.
---------
General edits or suggestions...
1. This book is for the few who are willing to
look at facts THEY way they are, and not just the way that people want them to be.
The 80/20 rule - and why I believe that it is overly optimistic
Change: Change the word THEY to the?
2. This sentence "Well, in order to make a successful and thriving Agrarian people (the American colonies prior to the War Between The States) accept that industrialism would bring prosperity and unity, the minds of the people had to be subjugated and colonized." was confusing to me and I had to read it several times before I got it right. It may just be me but some simplification of the structure may make it easier to read such as, "Well, in order to make a successful and thriving Agrarian people turn from the benefits of production to the slavery of consumption (disguised as prosperity and unity) the minds of the people had to be subjugated and colonized."
Another thought...it is interesting how the slavery that existed in the south prior to the war between the states was replaced with a new system of slavery in industrialism. Not sure if that is something that is worth mentioning or not. I've been thinking about how the modern culture is all about slavery...for example: I can't own my own property without paying a tax on it. I can't have any financial privacy for all practical purposes due to income taxes. Most places you can't build anything without getting the permission of the state. We are brainwashed to think that college is a requirement for success (never mind that most people are more in debt when they leave college then when they start). Almost every aspect of grid-tied life is meant to keep you enslaved to it either by distracting you, keeping you ignorant of truth in various forms (Biblical, historical, etc), or simply trying to financially entangle you so that you can't get out.
Other random thoughts on topics that might be interesting in the book somewhere: How agrarian living impacted early America and things such as the Constitution, etc. How self-evident truths change over time as a culture changes. It is interesting how concepts that would be utterly foreign in an agrarian culture (such as government owning something like a "company") are now common place and normal.
It would also be interesting to trace the spiritual downgrade in parallel with the move to industrialism.
Lastly, does anyone else know what shibboleth means? I know that dumbing down writing to fit the times isn't a great idea...but maybe a simpler word here would be better? I've since looked it up...and if that was the goal it worked. ;-)
Keep up the good work.
-Stewart
Stewart good ideas, and I'll fix those errors. Yes, looking up Shibboleth was a goal. There are about 4 other "go look it up" words, so it is good that that was the only one that caught you.
Some of these ideas are good, but are so large that they would probably take a whole other book (or several years on the blog) to clear up. Specifically the downgrade in spirituality paralleled with Industrialism, which is something I have covered pretty extensively in sermons scattered over 5 years or so, but which I have not covered exhaustively in one place.
Michael
Extra credit to anyone who can name the 4 "look it up" words... Shibboleth was one of them.
Michael
I am not sure what the other three look-up words are, but I had to look up "plain of Shinar" and "Alaric".
Great introduction! There is a lot in it. Is there anything left for the book?
I personally really like the writings that parallel the Roman Empire and its fall to our day. I think that more could be said on that time period, possibly in another chapter. Maybe detail how the Roman Empire fell and broke into 10 kingdoms and how the little kingdom of Ravenna over took all the others:) Having a proper end-time perspective would be ideal in any off-grid Christian Biblical Agrarian community.
Great so for....
For your consideration.
I think changing these few words makes it read easier, but they are just personal preference, and not critical Some changes are punctuation, but I’m not an expert.
Reminder: you asked.
INTRODUCTION
2nd paragraph:
and have been the envy of the ‘whole’ world ~ prefer ‘entire’ to ‘whole’
3rd paragraph:
what ‘is’ likely to befall Western ~ prefer ‘will’ to ‘is’
JIT – JUST IN TIME
6th paragraph:
In a scene that has been repeated many times in history, city and suburb dwellers, angry, hungry and without any practical skills or means of support, devolved into pitiless beasts when the JIT (Just In Time) means of provisioning dried up, and when the means of production and distribution of mass-produced foods were destroyed. ~ This sentence bothers me, but I can’t seem to make it better. Somebody help me.
8th paragraph:
A hundred years after the sacking of Rome (need a comma here please) farm animals grazed in the now crumbling Colusseum.
Like in any major metropolis ~ prefer ‘Like’ to ‘As’
9th paragraph:
numbering problem
10th paragraph:
The advent of specialization fractured the mind and caused man to focus on pieces of the puzzle instead of the whole picture. ~ There is nothing wrong with this paragraph at all. It caused an epiphany in me, so I thought I’d take this opportunity to say thank you. Thank you.
MODERN SOCIETY AND THE MYTH OF MITIGATION OF THREATS
1st pargraph
It is a sublime spiritual irony that, had man remained within God’s declared will as to the manner and means of life and living, he would have not been so susceptible to the massive and destructive threats that face him today… and at the same time, having remained within God’s will, he would be less likely to be facing wrath as a result of his rebellion. ~ prefer ‘In a sublime spiritual irony’ to ‘It is a sublime spiritual irony’ (although really…..this is another area that bothers me, but I don’t feel like I can make it better. Again, somebody help me.)
THE 80/20 RULE – AND WHY I BELIEVE THAT IT IS OVERLY OPTIMISTIC
5th paragraph
are now not viable or sustainable, ~ prefer are ‘not now’ to ‘now not’
******************************
I have to go for now, but, I'll be back.
I am looking forward to reading more. I have nothing to add, being merely a student of agrarianism, but I appreciate that you've introduced the need for a "paradigm shift" in one's thinking. This is key in making any kind of change. Write on.
Michael,
As with all of your books, this one educates, challenges and captures attention so far. Since you requested input, here are my $.02 on the Introduction:
Quick preface to my comments: I list a few words that appear redundant to me, however, I know they may be there purposefully to make a point, in which case please disregard.
o The word "nervous" appears in both the 1st and 2nd paragraphs. It comes across a bit redundant to me. Perhaps a different word in the 2nd paragraph could be used to augment the idea (ie: vulnerable, latent or ignored anxiety, etc.)
o JIT Section:
- 2nd Paragraph: The word "constant" appears redundant to me in the same sentence.
- Last sentence in last paragraph: According to Webster.com the term "worry-wort" should be spelled "worrywart"
0 80/20 Rule Section:
- 1st Paragraph: "especially while I was back in the world". I'm not sure your demographic knows what this means yet. Would it be helpful to say the "world system"?
- 2nd Paragraph: the term "short amount of time" seems redundant to me
o Sin is Codified....Section
- 1st Paragraph: "It is our opinion..." Who is "our"? Maybe I missed it but have you defined this perspective from anyone other than yourself at this point?
- 4th Paragraph: The word "already" seems redundant to me.
- "We believe that..." Who is "we"?
Thank you for writing this much needed book.
Susan
Michael,
Excellent introduction. I was captivated from the beginning. Renee' and Susan have already addressed some of the things that caught my eye, so no need to repeat them.
Just this introduction alone has given me greater insight into historical Rome and how it parallels our current world system.
Here were my 4 'look it up' words:
Plain of Shinar
Shibboleth
Obeisance
Expropriated
Looking forward to more ...
Michael,
I just got around to reading his introduction yesterday and it is good. VERY good. You are off to an excellent start. I have nothing to add right now aside from encouragement.
Most fat, ignorant, and lazy modernists are likely to disagree with me, because most fat, ignorant, and lazy modernists do not have any idea what life would be like (even on a very short term level) without the government sponsored artificial womb that has been created for them and in which they now live.
I think the same sentence could be written like this and no meaning would be lost.
"Most modernist have no idea what life would be like (even on a very short term level)without the government ......"
Kris
I've wondered what the people of Rome had become as individuals and as a society in terms of moral decay. It's been said that the nation fell from within and military defeat followed. It would be interesting to read more about it if your plans for the book will allow it. Maybe our times are reflected in those details too.
Larry
Maelstrom
Shinar
shibboleths
Obeisance
So Why This Book? ~ 2nd pargraph
Thousands of years of history and successful living were thrown out, (please insert the word ‘like’) the baby with the bathwater.
Individuality was replaced with a horrible fake of the same name.
Replace ‘horrible fake’ with the word ‘hologram’. ~ In looking up ‘hologram’ the definition said ‘converse of object’ and ‘converse’ says ‘the opposite, or reverse’. Or maybe the word ‘horrible’ could just be horrid?
GETTING OUT
1st paragraph
Getting "off-grid" looks like a monstrous and overwhelming task. It is the giant in the land that keeps us from going in and taking the good land that God has promised us. – Reference, as Susan says, ‘for your demographic’ the bible ~ Numbers 13
Michael,
You are off to an excellent start.Lots of great suggestions have already been noted. I just finished reading the intro., so sorry I'm late in responding. I found a few things that might merit changing.
The 80/20 rule
Last paragraph- "Even the term Survival, as it is most commonly used today, implies “lasting” or “making it through” to a time or place where the artificial womb of government or industry supplied material comfort and safety is in place." I think "back" in place would be more appropriate.
So Why This Book? section
"The whole mind was fragmented and compartmentalized so that the man or woman can be forced into specialization – like an ant or a bee in a colony." The "tenses" don't match up. Either- The whole mind "is" fragmented and compartmentalized so that the man or woman can be forced into specialization... Or- The whole mind was fragmented and compartmentalized so that the man or woman "could" be forced into specialization...
The Grid section.
First sentence-
...that we are hypocrites or that we are in the precise same position...
Maybe- ...that we are hypocrites or that we are in precisely the same position...
Very educational look up words too. I had to look up obeisance and shibboleths too. I like saying that one fast shibboleth, shibboleth, shibboleth. Looking forward to more.
Al
Michael,
Do you think you could number each paragraph in your posts? I think I'd be more apt to comment if it were easier to refer to the paragraph I want to respond to.
My children and I studied ancient Rome this year, and I noticed many parallels to modern America, as well. It was scary.
Have you decided upon who is the target audience of your book? Are you trying to appeal to a broad range of people? Do you want to wake people up? Do you want to help people who are already awake, but just need some help from someone who has already set their feet in the water? Maybe you already addressed that somewhere else, but I think that would be useful information to those of us who would like to comment.
Keep up the good work, and God bless you as you labor, both in the fields, and at the keyboard.
Michael,
I have not had time, until today, to print this out and read it. I just can't read long things on the computer...
Anyway, I don't have any corrections or suggestions, but it is very good and I am looking forward to more.
:-D
Could you include that the reason this is happening is because man has chosen to leave God's statutes and ordinances? That this is the curse for not living according to the Word. Also that as man becomes more wicked, destruction is soon to follow. I would like to say that this will be a very good and eye opening book if the Lord gives the readers the eyes to see. Thanks, Johnboy1970
Hi Michael, I came accross you blog by a link on one of the palm pre websites and I'm glad I decided to click on it.
I'm currently in the process of "getting out" of the city and everything you wrote has great meaning at this point in my life. I've wanted to do this for some time now, but it took a cut in pay from my employer which is a large company who's name starts with an S and ends with a G and makes microchips for just about everything including the Pre and Iphone. Our family will be moving outside of San Antonio and onto 10 acres of family owned property. We are selling our brick and mortar home in the city and downsizing into a single wide mobile home. Living within our means is one of our goals but simplicity is the other. Our plans are to grow some small crops and try and live off of the land. I know this will be no easy task but it's something we must do.
"Thus saith the LORD, Stand ye in the ways, and see, and ask for the old paths, where is the good way, and walk therein, and ye shall find rest for your souls. But they said, We will not walk therein (Jer. 6:16)."
This has great meaning to me right now because I'm basically moving back home. Back down the old path from which I came and will walk therin.
Thanks and keep up the great work!
Let's pray for some more rain. There's not a whole lot in the Austin area right not:(
Michael,
If it's not too late, more comments about the Introduction.
2nd paragraph: add a comma after century, make democracies lower case, add the word "their" to read "their standard of living."
JIT section:
I wanted a little more explanation of your definition of JIT.
I think the last sentence of the 1st paragraph would read better like this:
A middle-class shopper in Rome could, with relative ease and affordability, buy spices...
Colosseum (sp)
paragraph 6:
I agreed with Renee that the last sentence was confusing.
paragraph 7:
maybe begin with: After the fall of Rome, Europe descended...
popes should be lower case here
paragraph 8 (still in the JIT section): I really liked the sentence in the middle: The technological feat that was Rome... very astute!!!
MODERN SOCIETY section
Great Depression should be capitalized
80/20 RULE section
last sentence is spot on - sad, but true
SO WHY THIS BOOK section
I agreed with Anonymous about the middle sentence (America prior to WBTS) being awkward. I don't have a suggestion, though.
THE GRID section
3rd sentence was awkward...maybe put the ( ) part as its own sentence?
2nd paragraph:
put comma after say
...they will say, "Ha!...
3rd paragraph:
include period within parenthesis, after the word parable
GETTING OUT section
1st paragraph:
..it will cost you more to get out than to stay out.
That part really struck me. You're so right. Very sobering.
anesthetize (sp)
Jer 6:16 Yes!
I think your book is going to be great!! Thanks again for your labors. If I could, I'd send some cooler air your way.
I think you need to do more research on the Church during and after the fall of Rome. Your statement that power hungry priests,monks and Popes would keep people in un Biblical superstitions is inaccurate. I suggest reading Thomas E Woods Jr's well researched book _How the Catholic Church Built Western Civilization_ and Dave Armstrong's book _A Biblical Defense of Catholicism_. Mr Armstrong, along with Scott Hahn are both former evangelicals who reconciled with the Church. You don't need to take a side swipe at the institution that Christ Himself gave us. Your history is misinformed. Other than that, I wish you well on a needed endeavor. Just get your facts correct and don't add to the bashing.
I know I'm a bit late for the train, but really like the general layout and historical background in this. I'm going to download it so I can comb through it and will send anything I come up with.
Judy
I would like to respond to the anonymous Papal apologist.
That you would defend an institution that has so much true Christian blood on its hands is inexplainable.
That you would overlook the long Catholic history of suppressing the truth of the bible by any means necessary including lies, torture, imprisonment, and murder is shocking.
That you would support a priest culture that has taken such pains to protect their own child psyche murdering diddlers and molesters who pose as representatives of Christ is both sickening and rage inducing.
I pray that the Holy Spirit does a work in your heart, your eyes are made to see the truth, your stony heart is made flesh and that you are saved before it is too late.
- Todd
I am quite impressed at the collection of information, personal knowledge and keen transmission through your quite easy to understand writing style. After reading The Decline and Fall of Rome I was so psyched to here your Babylonian parallels. I have a qualm though. First let me preface; I am coming from a quite similar philosophic and theological grounding as you. Hearing your messages feels very agreeable and natural to me, when I read your posts I think, "how could anyone not see the truth through all the smoke and mirrors when it has been pointed out quite clear and directly?"
As an outsider, unfamiliar with your message- which I assume is your ultimate desired audience- the idea and transmission of the word "sin" seems to continually be a stumbling block for many. While again, I agree that not greed but sin, not division but sin and not pride but sin is the ultimate issue manifesting itself in humanity through its many perverted forms, I feel a definition of what you mean by "sin" is due for those who are going to assume it is a dogmatic term referring to an infraction of a standardized list of rules.
I will offer a basic suggestion.
Being that we believe our God has created a world, which is permeated with his presence and indeed created through Him, in Him and for Him, we might say that the world and intended order and function as he created it is the most "natural" way of life. If God creates man and intends him to live from the earth and with the earth, this is the "natural" order of things. If God creates man and he is intended to be peaceable and live harmoniously with one another, that goodwill and "love" is the most natural form of interaction at is most elemental level. Sin then, can be defined as the deviation from the natural intentions God has for man and his life here on earth. A "perversion" or "leading away" from the natural order. Thus that natural man is becoming less and less in touch with TRUE nature the further he falls into "sin." The less human we become, the weaker and more ravenous a being we are. Devolving into a state of animal frenzy becomes the chaotic situation when nature is overthrown by the synthetic forms of life we have created to incubate a "better" human existence.
I feel like this idea of sin is a little more understandable and correlates well with your overall message to people whom have been trained to think sin is the term used to condemn and judge the world of its ungodly infractions of pious law and order- yet it still retains its meaning and understanding that you and I have when we skip the description of it and quite simply refer to such devious human behavior as "sinning". If sin is the inherent deviation from the true natural order that God created for us, then indeed we ARE all sinning and need to be constantly reminded and directed back to the ways in which we were intended to live- loving, serving praising and cultivating the beings and world around us.
Perhaps my theologies are a little intense or un-needed for your overall message, and indeed it is quite a good one regardless. But I felt if there was one thing that could lend a bit of credibility or open up doors of understanding for people beyond those who are already predisposed to agree with you- well, bring'em on!
God bless and I am incredibly influenced by your encouraging and wise messages.
These have been my thoughts for a very long time. It took me years to convince one that I should do this. I am working on my survival cabin right now. Howbeit, I have no idea where to go "off grid."
Also, I have no idea what liabilities to the state an off grid site entails.
If anyone can help me on my quest to find an off grid site, perhaps with some Christians let me know. My email is:
rune2402@yahoo.com
I am getting my gear ready.
Awesome read!
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home